Tearing down the ivory tower: Can Big Data succeed where BPM has failed ?

On Successful Workplace today there’s an interesting post about Big Data bringing down the house and it inspired me to continue the idea here.

The idea of a distinct group that only handles procurement, another that does shipping and receiving and another that manages partner channels is fading.

I’ve said in the past that traditional hierarchy must come down in favour of a networked enterprise model where information exchange and worker collaboration has no real boundaries: Restructuring for the Social Enterprise. But perhaps I’ve been looking in the wrong place for this to happen. I favoured the ‘social’ BPM craze at the time as the catalyst but maybe the real spark will come from how data, and in this case, Big Data will be collected, handled, shunted and consumed across the enterprise. And in doing so remove the archaic boundaries that have been in place for years as we move towards networking at the speed of data.

The volume, velocity and variety of data doesn’t fit the hierarchy and boundaries of the physical world. The amount of data won’t lessen…it will increase, so we can accurately say that the organization of the workplace will shift along with it.

Where BPM has failed to set alight these notions is that from a traditional standpoint it’s still very much stuck in the dark ages. Case Management has moved the world on and is fast catching up where we are today but it’s constrained by traditional methodology chained to BPM. What we need is a shift from structured process design and architectural models into freeform thinking and networked models, a bit like how the brain is mapped with neurons, where data can flow and connect with people without rigid silos or boundaries of hierarchy, where process can adapt according to the feedback it receives on this networked scale.

I don’t really care now how the shift takes place, whether it’s triggered from (a different) BPM, Case, Big Data, Enterprise Social or something else that has yet to emerge (an amalgamation of all ?) but in the 21st century hierarchy has no place in business. And while this may be hard for some to relinquish the ivory towers they hide inside there’s a baying mob at the foot of the silo wanting to tear it down. It’s really only a matter of time.

And as the article closes on SW, its just another chance for some to understand and adapt, and others to go the way of Kodak.



5 responses to “Tearing down the ivory tower: Can Big Data succeed where BPM has failed ?

  1. Theo – Spot on! I think many vendors are so trapped in incrementally expanding feature-functionality, they’ve forgotten the importance of architecture. Networked process is the future – it’s the enabler not only of context-aware processes and adaptive case management, it supports the interdependent processes, common in business value chains/webs and cross-cutting compliance applications that are very hard to implement in conventional BPMS. Neil Ward Dutton recently wrote an independent review of our technology – you can see we’ve answered the call. http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2012/07/new-report-on-the-radar-consilience.html. For a limited time you can download for free from https://www.box.com/s/78f00686e7de87b79686.


  2. Pingback: Hey, that’s not my job | Successful Workplace·

  3. Pingback: Hey, that's not my job - SuccessfulWorkplace·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s